NPPA Code of Ethics
Preamble
The National Press Photographers Association, a professional society that promotes the highest standards in visual journalism, acknowledges concern for every person's need both to be fully informed about public events and to be recognized as part of the world in which we live.
Visual journalists operate as trustees of the public. Our primary role is to report visually on the significant events and varied viewpoints in our common world. Our primary goal is the faithful and comprehensive depiction of the subject at hand. As visual journalists, we have the responsibility to document society and to preserve its history through images.
Photographic and video images can reveal great truths, expose wrongdoing and neglect, inspire hope and understanding and connect people around the globe through the language of visual understanding. Photographs can also cause great harm if they are callously intrusive or are manipulated.
This code is intended to promote the highest quality in all forms of visual journalism and to strengthen public confidence in the profession. It is also meant to serve as an educational tool both for those who practice and for those who appreciate photojournalism. To that end, The National Press Photographers Association sets forth the following.
Code of Ethics
Visual journalists and those who manage visual news productions are accountable for upholding the following standards in their daily work:
- Be accurate and comprehensive in the representation of subjects.
- Resist being manipulated by staged photo opportunities.
- Be complete and provide context when photographing or recording subjects. Avoid stereotyping individuals and groups. Recognize and work to avoid presenting one's own biases in the work.
- Treat all subjects with respect and dignity. Give special consideration to vulnerable subjects and compassion to victims of crime or tragedy. Intrude on private moments of grief only when the public has an overriding and justifiable need to see.
- While photographing subjects do not intentionally contribute to, alter, or seek to alter or influence events.
- Editing should maintain the integrity of the photographic images' content and context. Do not manipulate images or add or alter sound in any way that can mislead viewers or misrepresent subjects.
- Do not pay sources or subjects or reward them materially for information or participation.
- Do not accept gifts, favors, or compensation from those who might seek to influence coverage.
- Do not intentionally sabotage the efforts of other journalists.
Ideally, visual journalists should:
- Strive to ensure that the public's business is conducted in public. Defend the rights of access for all journalists.
- Think proactively, as a student of psychology, sociology, politics and art to develop a unique vision and presentation. Work with a voracious appetite for current events and contemporary visual media.
- Strive for total and unrestricted access to subjects, recommend alternatives to shallow or rushed opportunities, seek a diversity of viewpoints, and work to show unpopular or unnoticed points of view.
- Avoid political, civic and business involvements or other employment that compromise or give the appearance of compromising one's own journalistic independence.
- Strive to be unobtrusive and humble in dealing with subjects.
- Respect the integrity of the photographic moment.
- Strive by example and influence to maintain the spirit and high standards expressed in this code. When confronted with situations in which the proper action is not clear, seek the counsel of those who exhibit the highest standards of the profession. Visual journalists should continuously study their craft and the ethics that guide it.
Information from http://www.nppa.org/professional_development/business_practices/ethics.html
Ethics
Ethics could be described as the
principles of best practice that any photographer should adopt in carrying out their practice. The majority of these principles are based on common sense, goodwill, and morality rather than on laws and regulations. However, there are areas where the
law may provide a framework in which the photographer has to operate, e.g. copyright, contract law, etc.; and, in some countries, privacy legislation.
Most professional bodies that represent photographers have a
code of professional conduct that all members agree to be bound by, and which provides a standard of ethics to which they conform when working. It usually covers matters like confidentiality, exercising due skill and which provides a standard of ethics to which they conform when skill and care, the upholding of professional status, issues of corruption, and so on.
Although the UK does not have privacy laws, some countries do. These provide a legal framework in which the ethics of privacy reside. However, for those photographers not bound by legal constraints, it is in their interest not to misuse any photograph they have taken. Clearly
paparazzi sail close to the wind in this regard, often acquiring images using long lenses and other devious means which can bring the profession into disrepute. The events leading to the death of Diana, princess of Wales, in Paris in September 1997 are a case in point.
Photojournalists or
war photographers are regularly confronted with ethical issues of an extreme kind. In photographing identifiable victims of conflict or disaster, for example, they may have to consider whether they would wish themselves or their
families to be shown in such circumstances. Or, in another kind of situation, the photographer may have the choice of intervening to protect life instead of taking pictures. A third type of predicament arises when a photographer suspects that, for publicity or propaganda reasons, an atrocity or other criminal act may be taking place in order to be photographed. Finally, the photographer must ensure that his or her pictures show what they purport to show, without staging, restaging, or manipulation in the darkroom or by digital means. In practice, all these issues involve difficult grey areas, and implicate editors and newspaper proprietors as well as photographers.
There are codes governing the use of people in
advertisements. In the UK these are produced by the Committee of Advertising Practice and the
Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), which are also responsible for ensuring the code is applied in the public interest. Whilst the code does not have legal standing, it provides an ethical framework designed to protect both celebrities and the general public. The code requires, for example, that ‘Advertisers … seek written permission in advance if they portray or refer to individuals or their identifiable possessions in any advertisement’; and that ‘Advertisers who have not obtained prior permission from entertainers, politicians, sportsmen and others whose work gives them a high profile, should ensure that they are not portrayed in an offensive or adverse way.’ Whilst the codes are especially important to the advertising industry, photographers in general should be guided by them.
Those in professional practice will be aware of the need for client
confidentiality if an ethical framework is to be established for their work. Whether it be the portrait photographer making small talk with a client, or someone working in corporate photography where industrial secrets may be acquired, or information received as a consequence of negotiation or discussion, there is a need for all practitioners to adopt a confidential approach in their dealings with clients. Such conduct is required by professional bodies representing photographers as a condition of membership; and it is part of what makes a photographer a professional. As is stated in the British publication
Beyond the Lens, ‘If photographers do not respect the subjects of their photographs, or treat them fairly, then it is only to be expected that clients will insist on acquiring copyright and owning control of the photographs themselves.’
Passing off, whilst quite rare, arises when a practitioner uses misrepresentation to take advantage of the reputation and work of another. An example might be where one photographer puts images of another photographer in his or her portfolio, passing them off as their own work. This is both unethical and tantamount to fraud. Photographic assistants need to be especially careful here. Having collaborated on a shoot with a photographer it may be a short step to passing off the resultant image as one's own, especially if one has done most of the work to achieve the shot. However, it is important to realize that the client is the photographer's, and that the latter was responsible both for the creative solution and the costs of the shoot.
Plagiarism is often mistaken for passing off, but is quite different. Basing an image on the work of another photographer without reworking, or using text authored by someone else without giving credit, is plagiarism. This is not fraud, it is copyright infringement and comparable to theft. Care should always be exercised when receiving a brief for new work, especially if the example provided by the client is based on the work of another photographer. It is in the photographer's interest to point out to the client the difficulties of ‘copying’ the ideas of another. Both the photographer's and the client's reputation may be at stake, and legal action may also ensue.
Those who commission photography, whether it be an advertising agent or a
mother wanting a photograph of her baby, are always looking for someone whom they can trust to take the photographs. Trust is acquired through a professional working attitude, integrity in the approach to managing the shoot, and the business side of the commission. Of course all clients want high-quality work. They also want to be assured that if things go wrong, the photographer will not hesitate to put things right. This working relationship is paramount for the long-term success of any business, and is the basis of a photographer's reputation.
The range and variety of photographic work is such that it is hard to generalize too broadly about standards of conduct. Someone running an average high-street business is likely, most of the time, to face different ethical issues from, for example, a
paparazzo or a photojournalist covering a civil war. However, the ASA's stipulation about the ethical requirements of advertising work could apply equally well to the work of photographers: namely, that it be legal, decent, honest, and truthful; prepared with a sense of responsibility to consumers and society; and have regard for the principles of fair
competition generally accepted in business.
Information from http://www.answers.com/topic/ethics-and-photography
